Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "arm: mvebu: x240: Use i2c-gpio instead of built in controller"

2023-10-16 Thread Stefan Roese
On 10/5/23 09:54, Stefan Roese wrote: On 10/3/23 05:57, Chris Packham wrote: This reverts commit 5c1c6b7306f2b4c0fd50c7cb5d757e245b93606e. The reason for switching to i2c-gpio was due to an issue we were seeing in the Linux kernel where the CPU would lock up on certain adverse I2C bus conditions

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "arm: mvebu: x240: Use i2c-gpio instead of built in controller"

2023-10-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On 10/3/23 05:57, Chris Packham wrote: This reverts commit 5c1c6b7306f2b4c0fd50c7cb5d757e245b93606e. The reason for switching to i2c-gpio was due to an issue we were seeing in the Linux kernel where the CPU would lock up on certain adverse I2C bus conditions. We were never able to reproduce the l

[PATCH 2/2] Revert "arm: mvebu: x240: Use i2c-gpio instead of built in controller"

2023-10-02 Thread Chris Packham
This reverts commit 5c1c6b7306f2b4c0fd50c7cb5d757e245b93606e. The reason for switching to i2c-gpio was due to an issue we were seeing in the Linux kernel where the CPU would lock up on certain adverse I2C bus conditions. We were never able to reproduce the lockup in U-Boot but assumed that was prob