Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Remove unnecessary pinmux option dependency

2022-05-24 Thread Andre Przywara
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 00:13:34 -0500 Samuel Holland wrote: > Now that the pinmux conflict is handled in the board code (by skipping > setup for the one conflicting MMC controller), the driver does not need > to be entirely disabled based on the UART pinmux. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland Appl

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Remove unnecessary pinmux option dependency

2022-04-10 Thread Peng Fan (OSS)
On 2022/4/10 13:13, Samuel Holland wrote: Now that the pinmux conflict is handled in the board code (by skipping setup for the one conflicting MMC controller), the driver does not need to be entirely disabled based on the UART pinmux. Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland Reviewed-by: Peng Fan

[PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Remove unnecessary pinmux option dependency

2022-04-09 Thread Samuel Holland
Now that the pinmux conflict is handled in the board code (by skipping setup for the one conflicting MMC controller), the driver does not need to be entirely disabled based on the UART pinmux. Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland --- drivers/mmc/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deleti