[PATCH 3/3] imx: imx8m: Don't use the addr parameter of reset_cpu

2020-05-01 Thread sbabic
> From: Claudius Heine > imx8m has the only implementation of `reset_cpu` which does not ignore > the addr parameter and instead gives it some meaning as the base address > of watchdog registers. This breaks convention with the rest of U-Boot > where the parameter is ignored and callers are

Re: [PATCH 3/3] imx: imx8m: Don't use the addr parameter of reset_cpu

2020-03-04 Thread Harald Seiler
Hello Marek, On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 15:30 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/4/20 3:23 PM, Harald Seiler wrote: > > From: Claudius Heine > > > > imx8m has the only implementation of `reset_cpu` which does not ignore > > the addr parameter and instead gives it some meaning as the base address > >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] imx: imx8m: Don't use the addr parameter of reset_cpu

2020-03-04 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/4/20 3:23 PM, Harald Seiler wrote: > From: Claudius Heine > > imx8m has the only implementation of `reset_cpu` which does not ignore > the addr parameter and instead gives it some meaning as the base address > of watchdog registers. This breaks convention with the rest of U-Boot > where

[PATCH 3/3] imx: imx8m: Don't use the addr parameter of reset_cpu

2020-03-04 Thread Harald Seiler
From: Claudius Heine imx8m has the only implementation of `reset_cpu` which does not ignore the addr parameter and instead gives it some meaning as the base address of watchdog registers. This breaks convention with the rest of U-Boot where the parameter is ignored and callers are passing in 0.