On 10/12/22 07:36, Ovidiu Panait wrote:
Current xilinx_timer_get_count() implementation does not take into account
the periodic 32-bit wrap arounds, as it directly returns the 32-bit counter
register value. The roll-overs cause problems in the upper timer layers, as
generic timer code expects
On 10/12/22 07:36, Ovidiu Panait wrote:
Current xilinx_timer_get_count() implementation does not take into account
the periodic 32-bit wrap arounds, as it directly returns the 32-bit counter
register value. The roll-overs cause problems in the upper timer layers, as
generic timer code expects
Current xilinx_timer_get_count() implementation does not take into account
the periodic 32-bit wrap arounds, as it directly returns the 32-bit counter
register value. The roll-overs cause problems in the upper timer layers, as
generic timer code expects an incrementing 64-bit value from
3 matches
Mail list logo