On 9/11/20 4:04 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:17 AM Sean Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
>> problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
>> initialized the IPI device.
>>
>> This commit
Hi, Bin
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:07:57AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:58 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:04:13PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:17 AM Sean Anderson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Some IPIs may already be pe
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:04:13PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:17 AM Sean Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> > problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
> > initialized the IPI d
Hi Leo,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:10 PM Leo Liang wrote:
>
> Hi, Bin
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:07:57AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:58 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:04:13PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020
Hi Sean
> On 9/9/20 5:01 AM, Rick Chen wrote:
> > Hi Sean
> >
> >> Hi Sean
> >>
> >>> Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> >>> problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart
> >>> has
> >>> initialized the IPI device.
> >>>
> >>> This
Hi Leo,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:58 AM Leo Liang wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:04:13PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:17 AM Sean Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> > > problem if a secondary hart tr
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:17 AM Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
> initialized the IPI device.
>
> This commit uses NULL as a sentinel for secondary harts s
Hi Sean
> On 9/9/20 5:01 AM, Rick Chen wrote:
> > Hi Sean
> >
> >> Hi Sean
> >>
> >>> Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> >>> problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart
> >>> has
> >>> initialized the IPI device.
> >>>
> >>> This
On 9/9/20 6:26 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 9/9/20 12:16 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 9/9/20 5:01 AM, Rick Chen wrote:
>>> Hi Sean
>>>
Hi Sean
> Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI b
On 9/9/20 12:16 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 9/9/20 5:01 AM, Rick Chen wrote:
>> Hi Sean
>>
>>> Hi Sean
>>>
Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
initialized the IPI device
On 9/9/20 5:01 AM, Rick Chen wrote:
> Hi Sean
>
>> Hi Sean
>>
>>> Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
>>> problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
>>> initialized the IPI device.
>>>
>>> This commit uses NULL as a sentinel for
Hi Sean
> Hi Sean
>
> > Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> > problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
> > initialized the IPI device.
> >
> > This commit uses NULL as a sentinel for secondary harts so they know when
> > the
Hi Sean
> Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
> problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
> initialized the IPI device.
>
> This commit uses NULL as a sentinel for secondary harts so they know when
> the IPI is initialized, and
Some IPIs may already be pending when U-Boot is started. This could be a
problem if a secondary hart tries to handle an IPI before the boot hart has
initialized the IPI device.
This commit uses NULL as a sentinel for secondary harts so they know when
the IPI is initialized, and it is safe to use t
14 matches
Mail list logo