On 1/10/24 03:03, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 1/9/24 05:27, Alexey Romanov wrote:
>> > Hello Sean!
>> >
>> > Thanks for you reply.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:45:04AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> >> On 12/28/23 1
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:14:45AM +, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Hi Mattijs,
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> > Hi Alexey, Sean,
> >
> > On mer., janv. 10, 2024 at 08:03, Alexey Romanov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:4
Hi Mattijs,
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> Hi Alexey, Sean,
>
> On mer., janv. 10, 2024 at 08:03, Alexey Romanov
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >> On 1/9/24 05:27, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> >> >
Hi Alexey, Sean,
On mer., janv. 10, 2024 at 08:03, Alexey Romanov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 1/9/24 05:27, Alexey Romanov wrote:
>> > Hello Sean!
>> >
>> > Thanks for you reply.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:45:04AM -0500, Sean
Sorry, my e-mail client is lagging and I sent two replies.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:03:39AM +, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > On 1/9/24 05:27, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> > > Hello Sean!
> > >
> > > Thanks for you reply.
> > >
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 1/9/24 05:27, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> > Hello Sean!
> >
> > Thanks for you reply.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:45:04AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >> On 12/28/23 10:25, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> >> > Currently, fastboo
On 1/9/24 05:27, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Hello Sean!
>
> Thanks for you reply.
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:45:04AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 12/28/23 10:25, Alexey Romanov wrote:
>> > Currently, fastboot protocol in U-Boot has no opportunity
>> > to execute vendor custom code with veri
Hello Sean!
Thanks for you reply.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:45:04AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 12/28/23 10:25, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> > Currently, fastboot protocol in U-Boot has no opportunity
> > to execute vendor custom code with verifed boot.
>
> Well, I would say the most convention
On 12/28/23 10:25, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Currently, fastboot protocol in U-Boot has no opportunity
> to execute vendor custom code with verifed boot.
Well, I would say the most conventional way to do this would be something like
=> fastboot 0
=> source \# CONFIG_FASTBOOT_BUF_ADDR
and on your h
Currently, fastboot protocol in U-Boot has no opportunity
to execute vendor custom code with verifed boot. This patch
introduce new fastboot subcommand fastboot oem board:,
which allow to run custom oem_board function.
Default implementation is __weak. Vendor must redefine it in
board/ folder with
10 matches
Mail list logo