On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:32 AM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > It appears that U-Boot works by luck on Intel Edison board because the
> > amount
> > of RAM is less than 1 GB and standard way of calculating the top of it work
> > for this con
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> It appears that U-Boot works by luck on Intel Edison board because the amount
> of RAM is less than 1 GB and standard way of calculating the top of it work
> for this configuration. However, this won't work if the amount of RAM is
> differ
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:12:17PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 05:40, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It appears that U-Boot works by luck on Intel Edison board because the
> > > amount
> > > of
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:12:17PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 05:40, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > It appears that U-Boot works by luck on Intel Edison board because the
> > amount
> > of RAM is less than 1 GB and standard way of calculating the top of it work
> > for t
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 05:40, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> It appears that U-Boot works by luck on Intel Edison board because the amount
> of RAM is less than 1 GB and standard way of calculating the top of it work
> for this configuration. However, this won't work if the amount of RAM is
> differen
It appears that U-Boot works by luck on Intel Edison board because the amount
of RAM is less than 1 GB and standard way of calculating the top of it work
for this configuration. However, this won't work if the amount of RAM is
different and split differently in address space. We have to fine the su
6 matches
Mail list logo
