Hi Quentin,
On Sat, 3 Sept 2022 at 11:45, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On September 3, 2022 7:01:14 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Glass
> wrote:
> >Hi Quentin,
> >
> >On Sat, 3 Sept 2022 at 02:48, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On September 2, 2022 10:00:18 PM GMT+02:00,
Hi Simon,
On September 3, 2022 7:01:14 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Glass
wrote:
>Hi Quentin,
>
>On Sat, 3 Sept 2022 at 02:48, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On September 2, 2022 10:00:18 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Glass
>> wrote:
>> >Hi Quentin,
>> >
>> >On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 08:44, Quentin
Hi Quentin,
On Sat, 3 Sept 2022 at 02:48, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On September 2, 2022 10:00:18 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Glass
> wrote:
> >Hi Quentin,
> >
> >On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 08:44, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Quentin Schulz
> >>
> >> The binary is looked on the
Hi Simon,
On September 2, 2022 10:00:18 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Glass
wrote:
>Hi Quentin,
>
>On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 08:44, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>>
>> From: Quentin Schulz
>>
>> The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
>> This means binman was looking for btool_gzip
Hi Quentin,
On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 08:44, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> From: Quentin Schulz
>
> The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
> This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip.
>
> Since a btool can have its btool_ prefix missing but
From: Quentin Schulz
The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip.
Since a btool can have its btool_ prefix missing but its module and
binary presence on the system appropriately found, there's no
6 matches
Mail list logo
