On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 03:17:18 +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Improve clk_get_rate() @return documentation that otherwise is a bit
> ambiguous. At the moment I expect to return 0 as error since the return
> type is 'ulong', instead the function really returns negative value in
> case the
On 2/13/21 9:17 PM, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Improve clk_get_rate() @return documentation that otherwise is a bit
ambiguous. At the moment I expect to return 0 as error since the return
type is 'ulong', instead the function really returns negative value in
case the corresponding function pointer is
Hi Lukasz,
kindly ping
Best regards
--
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas
On 2/23/21 1:25 AM, Giulio Benetti wrote:
On 2/22/21 8:13 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 2/14/21 4:49 AM, Jesse T wrote:
Awesome, thanks! I must have forgotten how twos complement works for a
sec...
On Sat,
On 2/22/21 8:13 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 2/14/21 4:49 AM, Jesse T wrote:
Awesome, thanks! I must have forgotten how twos complement works for a
sec...
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:17 PM Giulio Benetti <
giulio.bene...@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
Hi Jesse,
Il giorno 14 feb 2021,
On 2/14/21 4:49 AM, Jesse T wrote:
Awesome, thanks! I must have forgotten how twos complement works for a
sec...
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:17 PM Giulio Benetti <
giulio.bene...@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
Hi Jesse,
Il giorno 14 feb 2021, alle ore 03:58, Jesse T
ha scritto:
This looks
Awesome, thanks! I must have forgotten how twos complement works for a
sec...
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:17 PM Giulio Benetti <
giulio.bene...@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Il giorno 14 feb 2021, alle ore 03:58, Jesse T
> ha scritto:
>
>
> This looks good to me, and helps
Hi Jesse,
> Il giorno 14 feb 2021, alle ore 03:58, Jesse T ha
> scritto:
>
>
> This looks good to me, and helps beginners like me. As for the function
> itself, i have 2 concerns: If it does return a negative value why is it
> unsigned, if it is in fact signed that a clock above 2.2Ghz is
This looks good to me, and helps beginners like me. As for the function
itself, i have 2 concerns: If it does return a negative value why is it
unsigned, if it is in fact signed that a clock above 2.2Ghz is a negative
number. As for the IS_ERR_VALUE macro there still is a chance that it will
error
Improve clk_get_rate() @return documentation that otherwise is a bit
ambiguous. At the moment I expect to return 0 as error since the return
type is 'ulong', instead the function really returns negative value in
case the corresponding function pointer is null and returns 0 if the clock
is invalid.
9 matches
Mail list logo
