On 08/06/2023 17:54, Conor Dooley wrote:
From: Conor Dooley
intro
=
When the RISC-V dt-bindings were accepted upstream in Linux, the base
ISA etc had yet to be ratified. By the ratification of the base ISA,
incompatible changes had snuck into the specifications - for example the
Zicsr and
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 11:59:32 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:25:35AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt
I'm not wed to any particular encoding for the properties, IMO that's more
of a decision for the DT folks. IMO
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:25:35AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt
>
> I'm not wed to any particular encoding for the properties, IMO that's more
> of a decision for the DT folks. IMO the important bit is to just get away
> from ISA
On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:54:05 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote:
From: Conor Dooley
intro
=
When the RISC-V dt-bindings were accepted upstream in Linux, the base
ISA etc had yet to be ratified. By the ratification of the base ISA,
incompatible changes had snuck into the specifications - for
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 08:03:44AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Nope, vendor prefixes don't go in node names. That's not explicit
> anywhere, but goes against using generic node names.
Yeah, that makes sense.
> Also, note that looking at the DT spec, there's already prior art here
> with PPC.
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 12:05 PM Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:49:08AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:54:05 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> > > As a result of implementing Sean's suggestion, I believe I need to add
> > > riscv,isa-extensions as an
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:49:08AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:54:05 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > As a result of implementing Sean's suggestion, I believe I need to add
> > riscv,isa-extensions as an exception to the rules preventing vendor
> > properties being of object
On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:54:05 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley
>
> intro
> =
>
> When the RISC-V dt-bindings were accepted upstream in Linux, the base
> ISA etc had yet to be ratified. By the ratification of the base ISA,
> incompatible changes had snuck into the
From: Conor Dooley
intro
=
When the RISC-V dt-bindings were accepted upstream in Linux, the base
ISA etc had yet to be ratified. By the ratification of the base ISA,
incompatible changes had snuck into the specifications - for example the
Zicsr and Zifencei extensions were spun out of the
9 matches
Mail list logo