series against stm32mp135f-dk board which is using SCMI
> > resources, I see the board fails to boot.
> >
> > > From: AKASHI Takahiro
> > > To: tr...@konsulko.com, s...@chromium.org
> > > Cc: etienne.carri...@st.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
> > >
SHI Takahiro
> > To: tr...@konsulko.com, s...@chromium.org
> > Cc: etienne.carri...@st.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
> > AKASHI Takahiro
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 01/12] scmi: refactor the code to hide a channel from
> > devices
> > Date: Wed, 26 Ju
s.denx.de,
> AKASHI Takahiro
> Subject: [PATCH v2 01/12] scmi: refactor the code to hide a channel from
> devices
> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:37:57 +0900 [thread overview]
> Message-ID: <20230726083808.140780-2-takahiro.aka...@linaro.org> (raw)
> In-Reply-To: <
Hello Takahiro-san,
> From: U-Boot on behalf of Simon Glass
>
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 2:50 AM
>
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 02:38, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
> >
> > The commit 85dc58289238 ("firmware: scmi: prepare uclass to pass channel
> > reference") added an explicit parameter, channe
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 02:38, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
>
> The commit 85dc58289238 ("firmware: scmi: prepare uclass to pass channel
> reference") added an explicit parameter, channel, but it seems to make
> the code complex.
>
> Hiding this parameter will allow for adding a generic (protocol-agnosti
The commit 85dc58289238 ("firmware: scmi: prepare uclass to pass channel
reference") added an explicit parameter, channel, but it seems to make
the code complex.
Hiding this parameter will allow for adding a generic (protocol-agnostic)
helper function, i.e. for PROTOCOL_VERSION, in a later patch.
6 matches
Mail list logo