Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: put device tree into EfiACPIReclaimMemory

2020-05-12 Thread Grant Likely
On 11/05/2020 12:55, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 11.05.20 10:48, Grant Likely wrote: On 07/05/2020 19:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: According to the UEFI spec ACPI tables should be placed in EfiACPIReclaimMemory. Let's do the same with the device tree. Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel Cc:

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: put device tree into EfiACPIReclaimMemory

2020-05-11 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 11.05.20 10:48, Grant Likely wrote: > On 07/05/2020 19:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> According to the UEFI spec ACPI tables should be placed in >> EfiACPIReclaimMemory. Let's do the same with the device tree. >> >> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel >> Cc: Grant Likely >> Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: put device tree into EfiACPIReclaimMemory

2020-05-11 Thread Grant Likely
On 07/05/2020 19:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: According to the UEFI spec ACPI tables should be placed in EfiACPIReclaimMemory. Let's do the same with the device tree. Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Grant Likely Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- v2: adjust the unit test Is

[PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: put device tree into EfiACPIReclaimMemory

2020-05-07 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
According to the UEFI spec ACPI tables should be placed in EfiACPIReclaimMemory. Let's do the same with the device tree. Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Grant Likely Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- v2: adjust the unit test --- cmd/bootefi.c | 4 ++--