On 9/27/23 10:34, Andre Przywara wrote:
In the majority of cases, there are no changes to the text section
introduced by this patch. In the R40 case, there's a small change where
the compiler adds a NULL check onto the result of the `(void *)cpucfg +
SUN8I_R40_PWR_CLAMP(cpu)` computation, which w
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:17:07 -0700
Sam Edwards wrote:
> On 8/18/23 10:40, Sam Edwards wrote:
> > On 8/18/23 07:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> >> The resulting object file is different (8 byte larger,
> >> even), so it's hard to prove
> >
> > I'm no stranger to reading ob
On 8/18/23 10:40, Sam Edwards wrote:
On 8/18/23 07:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Andre,
The resulting object file is different (8 byte larger,
even), so it's hard to prove
I'm no stranger to reading object code. Since the output should be
identical in principle, I'll spend a little bit of ti
On 8/18/23 07:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Andre,
The resulting object file is different (8 byte larger,
even), so it's hard to prove
I'm no stranger to reading object code. Since the output should be
identical in principle, I'll spend a little bit of time today seeing if
I can identify wha
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:34:16 -0700
Sam Edwards wrote:
Hi Sam,
thanks for the update.
> This patch restructures psci.c to get away from the "many different
> function definitions switched by #ifdef" paradigm to the preferred style
> of having a single function definition with `if (IS_ENABLED(...
This patch restructures psci.c to get away from the "many different
function definitions switched by #ifdef" paradigm to the preferred style
of having a single function definition with `if (IS_ENABLED(...))` to
make the optimizer include only the appropriate function bodies instead.
There are no f
6 matches
Mail list logo
