On 24/04/2020 15:51, Tom Rini wrote:
Hi Tom,
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:12:31PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
>> Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not
>> really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a
>> non-standard binding, either req
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:12:31PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not
> really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a
> non-standard binding, either requiring to have a "skip-init" property in
> the node, o
Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not
really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a
non-standard binding, either requiring to have a "skip-init" property in
the node, or to have an extra "clock" property holding the base
*frequency* value fo
3 matches
Mail list logo