Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] uart: pl011: Add proper DM clock support

2020-04-27 Thread André Przywara
On 24/04/2020 15:51, Tom Rini wrote: Hi Tom, > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:12:31PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not >> really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a >> non-standard binding, either req

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] uart: pl011: Add proper DM clock support

2020-04-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:12:31PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not > really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a > non-standard binding, either requiring to have a "skip-init" property in > the node, o

[PATCH v2 2/7] uart: pl011: Add proper DM clock support

2020-04-07 Thread Andre Przywara
Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a non-standard binding, either requiring to have a "skip-init" property in the node, or to have an extra "clock" property holding the base *frequency* value fo