On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 02:46:35PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 13:37, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:27:08PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 at 08:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 20
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 13:37, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:27:08PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 at 08:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:44:00PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Sean,
> > > >
> > > > On Fr
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:27:08PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 at 08:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:44:00PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Sean,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 15:04, Sean Anderson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 10
Hi Tom,
On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 at 08:40, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:44:00PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 15:04, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/21/22 4:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 13:24, Sean Anderson
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:44:00PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 15:04, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >
> > On 10/21/22 4:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 13:24, Sean Anderson
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> As discussed previously [1,2], the source c
Hi Sean,
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 15:04, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> On 10/21/22 4:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 13:24, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> As discussed previously [1,2], the source command is not safe to use with
> >> verified boot unless there is a key with require
On 10/21/22 4:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 13:24, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>
>> As discussed previously [1,2], the source command is not safe to use with
>> verified boot unless there is a key with required = "images" (which has its
>> own problems). This is because if such a ke
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 13:24, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> As discussed previously [1,2], the source command is not safe to use with
> verified boot unless there is a key with required = "images" (which has its
> own problems). This is because if such a key is absent, signatures are
> verified but not
As discussed previously [1,2], the source command is not safe to use with
verified boot unless there is a key with required = "images" (which has its
own problems). This is because if such a key is absent, signatures are
verified but not required. It is assumed that configuration nodes will
provide
9 matches
Mail list logo