Hi!
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 08:29, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> From: Sean Anderson
>
> U-boot prefers DM_MMC + BLK for MMC. Now eSDHC driver has already
> support it, so let's force to use it.
>
> - Drop non-BLK support for DM_MMC introduced by below patch.
>66fa035 mmc: fsl_esdhc: fix probe
From: Sean Anderson
U-boot prefers DM_MMC + BLK for MMC. Now eSDHC driver has already
support it, so let's force to use it.
- Drop non-BLK support for DM_MMC introduced by below patch.
66fa035 mmc: fsl_esdhc: fix probe issue without CONFIG_BLK enabled
- Support only DM_MMC + BLK (assuming
On 1/10/22 8:14 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Dear Sean,
On 1/5/22 1:16 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
[ fsl_esdhc commit 41dec2fe99512e941261594f522b2e7d485c314b ]
U-boot prefers DM_MMC + BLK for MMC. Now eSDHC driver has already
support it, so let's force to use it.
- Drop non-BLK support for
Dear Sean,
On 1/5/22 1:16 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> [ fsl_esdhc commit 41dec2fe99512e941261594f522b2e7d485c314b ]
>
> U-boot prefers DM_MMC + BLK for MMC. Now eSDHC driver has already
> support it, so let's force to use it.
>
> - Drop non-BLK support for DM_MMC introduced by below patch.
>
[ fsl_esdhc commit 41dec2fe99512e941261594f522b2e7d485c314b ]
U-boot prefers DM_MMC + BLK for MMC. Now eSDHC driver has already
support it, so let's force to use it.
- Drop non-BLK support for DM_MMC introduced by below patch.
66fa035 mmc: fsl_esdhc: fix probe issue without CONFIG_BLK enabled
[ fsl_esdhc commit 41dec2fe99512e941261594f522b2e7d485c314b ]
U-boot prefers DM_MMC + BLK for MMC. Now eSDHC driver has already
support it, so let's force to use it.
- Drop non-BLK support for DM_MMC introduced by below patch.
66fa035 mmc: fsl_esdhc: fix probe issue without CONFIG_BLK enabled
6 matches
Mail list logo