Hi Kever,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 21:49, Kever Yang wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2024/6/21 22:57, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 00:45, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On 2024-06-21 01:06, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> The code here is confusing due to lar
Hi Simon,
On 2024/6/21 22:57, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 00:45, Jonas Karlman wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 2024-06-21 01:06, Simon Glass wrote:
The code here is confusing due to large blocks which are #ifdefed out.
Add a function phase_sdram_init() which returns whether SDRA
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 00:45, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2024-06-21 01:06, Simon Glass wrote:
> > The code here is confusing due to large blocks which are #ifdefed out.
> > Add a function phase_sdram_init() which returns whether SDRAM init
> > should happen in the current
Hi Simon,
On 2024-06-21 01:06, Simon Glass wrote:
> The code here is confusing due to large blocks which are #ifdefed out.
> Add a function phase_sdram_init() which returns whether SDRAM init
> should happen in the current phase, using that as needed to control the
> code flow.
>
> This increases
The code here is confusing due to large blocks which are #ifdefed out.
Add a function phase_sdram_init() which returns whether SDRAM init
should happen in the current phase, using that as needed to control the
code flow.
This increases code size by about 500 bytes in SPL when the cache is on,
sinc
5 matches
Mail list logo
