Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] clk: qcom: add support for power domains uclass

2024-03-13 Thread Caleb Connolly
On 11/03/2024 21:33, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: > Now sub-drivers for particular SoCs can register them as power domain > drivers. This is needed for upcoming SM8150 support, because it needs > to power up the Ethernet module. > > Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk > > --- > Caleb suggested to us

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] clk: qcom: add support for power domains uclass

2024-03-13 Thread Caleb Connolly
Hi Volodymyr, On 11/03/2024 21:33, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: > Now sub-drivers for particular SoCs can register them as power domain > drivers. This is needed for upcoming SM8150 support, because it needs > to power up the Ethernet module. > Thanks again for working on this. I've been trying to r

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] clk: qcom: add support for power domains uclass

2024-03-12 Thread Caleb Connolly
On 11/03/2024 21:33, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: > Now sub-drivers for particular SoCs can register them as power domain > drivers. This is needed for upcoming SM8150 support, because it needs > to power up the Ethernet module. > > Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk Reviewed-by: Caleb Connolly >

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] clk: qcom: add support for power domains uclass

2024-03-12 Thread Sumit Garg
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 03:03, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: > > Now sub-drivers for particular SoCs can register them as power domain > drivers. This is needed for upcoming SM8150 support, because it needs > to power up the Ethernet module. > > Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk > > --- > Caleb suggeste

[PATCH v3 3/4] clk: qcom: add support for power domains uclass

2024-03-11 Thread Volodymyr Babchuk
Now sub-drivers for particular SoCs can register them as power domain drivers. This is needed for upcoming SM8150 support, because it needs to power up the Ethernet module. Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk --- Caleb suggested to use "imply POWER_DOMAIN", not "depends POWER_DOMAIN" in the Kconfig