Re: [PATCH v4] disk: dos: Add all options for EFI System Partitions

2024-03-07 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 11:20:31AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > The EFI spec states that the ESP can be any of FAT12/16/32 but for > compatibility doesn't necssarily require the partition to be the > EFI partition table ID of 0xef. A number of arm devices will not > find their firmware on a FAT

Re: [PATCH v4] disk: dos: Add all options for EFI System Partitions

2024-03-05 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 13:20, Peter Robinson wrote: > > The EFI spec states that the ESP can be any of FAT12/16/32 but for > compatibility doesn't necssarily require the partition to be the > EFI partition table ID of 0xef. A number of arm devices will not > find their firmware on a FAT partition

Re: [PATCH v4] disk: dos: Add all options for EFI System Partitions

2024-03-02 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Peter Robinson > Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 11:20:31 + > > The EFI spec states that the ESP can be any of FAT12/16/32 but for > compatibility doesn't necssarily require the partition to be the > EFI partition table ID of 0xef. A number of arm devices will not > find their firmware on a

[PATCH v4] disk: dos: Add all options for EFI System Partitions

2024-03-02 Thread Peter Robinson
The EFI spec states that the ESP can be any of FAT12/16/32 but for compatibility doesn't necssarily require the partition to be the EFI partition table ID of 0xef. A number of arm devices will not find their firmware on a FAT partition with an ID of 0xef so also allow the original FAT12/16/32