Re: [PATCH v4 13/39] pinctrl: qcom: stub support for special GPIOs

2024-02-20 Thread Sumit Garg
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 02:22, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > Most platforms have a handful of "special" GPIOs, like the MMC > clock/data lanes, UFS reset, etc. These don't follow the usually naming s/usually/usual/ > scheme of "gpioX" and also have unique capabilities and registers. We > can get

Re: [PATCH v4 13/39] pinctrl: qcom: stub support for special GPIOs

2024-02-19 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 15/02/2024 21:52, Caleb Connolly wrote: Most platforms have a handful of "special" GPIOs, like the MMC clock/data lanes, UFS reset, etc. These don't follow the usually naming scheme of "gpioX" and also have unique capabilities and registers. We can get away without supporting them all for

[PATCH v4 13/39] pinctrl: qcom: stub support for special GPIOs

2024-02-15 Thread Caleb Connolly
Most platforms have a handful of "special" GPIOs, like the MMC clock/data lanes, UFS reset, etc. These don't follow the usually naming scheme of "gpioX" and also have unique capabilities and registers. We can get away without supporting them all for now, but DT compatibility is still an issue.