Re: [PATCH v5 07/33] clk: Add K210 clock support

On 3/4/20 1:58 AM, Rick Chen wrote: > Hi Sean > >> Due to the large number of clocks, I decided to use the CCF. The overall >> structure is modeled after the imx code. Clocks are stored in several >> arrays. There are some translation macros (FOOIFY()) which allow for more >> dense packing. A

Re: [PATCH v5 07/33] clk: Add K210 clock support

Hi Sean > Due to the large number of clocks, I decided to use the CCF. The overall > structure is modeled after the imx code. Clocks are stored in several > arrays. There are some translation macros (FOOIFY()) which allow for more > dense packing. A possible improvement could be to only store

[PATCH v5 07/33] clk: Add K210 clock support

Due to the large number of clocks, I decided to use the CCF. The overall structure is modeled after the imx code. Clocks are stored in several arrays. There are some translation macros (FOOIFY()) which allow for more dense packing. A possible improvement could be to only store the parameters we