Hi Tom,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 12:56, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 12:55:08PM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 12:46, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:43:24PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:35
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 12:55:08PM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 12:46, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:43:24PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:35 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:29:30PM
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 12:46, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:43:24PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:35 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:29:30PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:23 PM Tom Rin
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:46 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:43:24PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:35 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:29:30PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:23 PM Tom Rini wro
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:43:24PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:35 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:29:30PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:23 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:35 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:29:30PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:23 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:17 AM Simon Glass
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:29:30PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:23 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:17 AM Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Buildman should consider a build as a
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:23 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:17 AM Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > Buildman should consider a build as a success (with warnings) if missing
> > > blobs have been dealt with by binma
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:17 AM Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Buildman should consider a build as a success (with warnings) if missing
> > blobs have been dealt with by binman, even though buildman itself returns
> > and error code ove
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:17 AM Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Buildman should consider a build as a success (with warnings) if missing
> blobs have been dealt with by binman, even though buildman itself returns
> and error code overall. This is how other warnings are dealt with.
>
> We cannot easily acce
Buildman should consider a build as a success (with warnings) if missing
blobs have been dealt with by binman, even though buildman itself returns
and error code overall. This is how other warnings are dealt with.
We cannot easily access the 103 exit code, so detect the problem in the
output.
Wit
Buildman should consider a build as a success (with warnings) if missing
blobs have been dealt with by binman, even though buildman itself returns
and error code overall. This is how other warnings are dealt with.
We cannot easily access the 103 exit code, so detect the problem in the
output.
Wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
