Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 01/11] net: dwc_eth_qos: Use dev_ functions calls to get FDT data

On 5/13/20 2:58 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote: > Dear David, > >> From: David Wu >> Sent: mardi 12 mai 2020 11:56 >> >> It seems dev_ functions are more general than fdt_ functions. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Wu It seems Joe still didn't come back, I have patches open for two+ months now. What do

RE: [RESEND PATCH v2 01/11] net: dwc_eth_qos: Use dev_ functions calls to get FDT data

Dear David, > From: David Wu > Sent: mardi 12 mai 2020 11:56 > > It seems dev_ functions are more general than fdt_ functions. > > Signed-off-by: David Wu > --- > > Changes in v2: > - None > > drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c | 7 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 01/11] net: dwc_eth_qos: Use dev_ functions calls to get FDT data

Hi David On 5/12/20 11:56 AM, David Wu wrote: > It seems dev_ functions are more general than fdt_ functions. > > Signed-off-by: David Wu > --- > > Changes in v2: > - None > > drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c | 7 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git

[RESEND PATCH v2 01/11] net: dwc_eth_qos: Use dev_ functions calls to get FDT data

It seems dev_ functions are more general than fdt_ functions. Signed-off-by: David Wu --- Changes in v2: - None drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c b/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c index