Hi Heinrich
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:25:01AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 1/17/22 08:58, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:16:51AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 01:49:07AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > The efidebug command
On 1/17/22 08:58, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:16:51AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 01:49:07AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
The efidebug command was conceived for testing purposes.
Well, I initially implemented the command as an alternative
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:16:51AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 01:49:07AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > The efidebug command was conceived for testing purposes.
>
> Well, I initially implemented the command as an alternative of
> "EFI shell" as the shell was
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 01:49:07AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> The efidebug command was conceived for testing purposes.
Well, I initially implemented the command as an alternative of
"EFI shell" as the shell was not able to run on EFI U-Boot at that time.
> The manipulation of boot
The efidebug command was conceived for testing purposes.
The manipulation of boot options does better fit to the bootefi command
that is used to invoke the boot manager.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
cmd/bootefi.c | 672 +-
cmd/efidebug.c
5 matches
Mail list logo