Hello.
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 13:44, John Rigby wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm still curious though if there are practical needs for both
> > fastboot and DFU enabled.
> >
> My only point was that I would rather DFU, Fastboot, USBSerial and any
> oth
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> I'm still curious though if there are practical needs for both
> fastboot and DFU enabled.
>
My only point was that I would rather DFU, Fastboot, USBSerial and any
other potential users of MUSB or other gadget usb hw not be written in
a
Hello.
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 09:32, John Rigby wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Given these different use cases I never seen fastboot and DFU as
> > competitors. Personally I see DFU as a good and standardized way of
> > _flashing_ devices while fastboot/n
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> Given these different use cases I never seen fastboot and DFU as
> competitors. Personally I see DFU as a good and standardized way of
> _flashing_ devices while fastboot/novacom are way to communicate with
> the bootloader (allow flashin
Hello.
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 20:07, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> The code uses the "newer" gadget API which is used by the rndis gadget for
> instance. The only udc implementing it (as far as I know) is the at91 udc
> sitting in cdc-at91 branch [0]. The other udcs in tree (musb for intanc
Hi,
The patch which should come as a reply to this email contains a fastboot
gadget for u-boot. I don't claim that the code has been tested or
anything. I just want to post what I have now and get some feedback on it.
The code uses the "newer" gadget API which is used by the rndis gadget for
inst
6 matches
Mail list logo
