On 09/23/2017 01:36 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to
>> 2017.09 or not ?
>
> It was already merged couple days ago:
>
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to
> 2017.09 or not ?
It was already merged couple days ago:
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=340d413f678a4a64dfa060e8fe0ac721b73fed97
and
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 09/21/2017 11:35 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 18
On 09/21/2017 11:35 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador <
otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br>
On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador <
>> otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>
>>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the
>>>
>>> release cycle?
On 2017-09-17 11:35 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it.
Same here.
Jackie said that he's going to investigate now.
We've only seen this failure since 2017-09-15 06:00 AM ET
after we rebased onto 2017-09-14 content/ this commit:
583dca2
On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador <
otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the
>
> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release?
>
>
> Why?
>
> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador <
> otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>
> > What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the
> >
> > release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the
Em 18 de set de 2017 12:20 PM, "Philip Balister"
escreveu:
On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it
On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot
>>> of boards, why nobody complained yet?
>>
>> Didn't you say it
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot
> > of boards, why nobody complained yet?
>
> Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ?
u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot of
boards, why nobody complained yet?
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 09/17/2017 01:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs
Hi Khem,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this?
I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it.
Please pay note to change in directory structure in u-boot envs (from
2017.09):
On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot
> of boards, why nobody complained yet?
Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ?
btw stop top-posting please.
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Marek
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this?
>
I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it.
> u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or
> directory
>
> I've
Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this?
u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or
directory
I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in
do_compile:
Log data follows:
| DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile
|
I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs fw_printenv
correctly with 2017.07.
And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro
and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As
nobody is using it and it's not tested?
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at
17 matches
Mail list logo