On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:49 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I tried to reproduce the bug you mentioned (multiple appearance of
> directories in ls output) using the script you provided, to no avail:
> ls correctly showed the top-level directory, both with and without
> CFG_JFFS2_SORT
Michael,
I tried to reproduce the bug you mentioned (multiple appearance of
directories in ls output) using the script you provided, to no avail:
ls correctly showed the top-level directory, both with and without
CFG_JFFS2_SORT_FRAGMENTS option.
I am inclined to suspect the same cause as you m
Joakim Tjernlund said the following:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:31 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> Could we modify this declaration to my non-static version in the trunk?
>
> Is this on PPC? If so it is due to missing fixup support. Grant Likely
> once sent a patch fixing this. It got applied, bu
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:31 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Michael Lawnick said the following:
> ...
> > - output of access rights is still corrupted, e.g.:
> > d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tue Oct 21 11:08:17 2008 10
> > --ÿÿ-ÿ 262144 Thu Jan 01 00:00:33 1970 u-boot.bin
> > d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tu
Michael Lawnick said the following:
...
> - output of access rights is still corrupted, e.g.:
> d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tue Oct 21 11:08:17 2008 10
> --ÿÿ-ÿ 262144 Thu Jan 01 00:00:33 1970 u-boot.bin
> d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tue Oct 21 11:08:32 2008 1
> d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tue Oct 21 11:00:58 20
Ilya Yanok said the following:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Michael Lawnick wrote:
...
>> d) output of 'ls' is corrupted: no date and access right output,
>> directories in / are shown multiple times
>
> Can you please be more specific on this? Is this with
> CFG_JFFS2_SORT_FRAGMENTS enabled or not? How di
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Sounds good. That is what we were expecting.
>>
>
> If you submit a patch, then please add such comments *below* the "---"
> line.
>
That wasn't a patch submission actually... I've just wanted Michael to
test if this patch helps with his problem. I'
Dear Ilya,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > I have put these patches to our board (MPC8548, NOR Flash, MTD partition
> > size 48MB).
> >
> > a) performance has improved (execution time of 'ls' reduced from ~16s to
> > ~1.5s)
> >
>
> Sou
Hello Michael,
Michael Lawnick wrote:
> I have put these patches to our board (MPC8548, NOR Flash, MTD partition
> size 48MB).
>
> a) performance has improved (execution time of 'ls' reduced from ~16s to
> ~1.5s)
>
Sounds good. That is what we were expecting.
> b) there is a bug in the patch
Ilya Yanok said the following:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> here is a set of changes we made to improve U-Boot JFFS2 code
>>> performance. We still can't reach Linux's performance but improvements
>>> are significant.
>>>
>>> Any comments are welcome.
>>>
>>
>> Are these patche
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> here is a set of changes we made to improve U-Boot JFFS2 code
>> performance. We still can't reach Linux's performance but improvements
>> are significant.
>>
>> Any comments are welcome.
>>
>
> Are these patches independent of each other, or are all
Dear Ilya,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> here is a set of changes we made to improve U-Boot JFFS2 code
> performance. We still can't reach Linux's performance but improvements
> are significant.
>
> Any comments are welcome.
Are these patches independent of each other, or are
Hello everybody,
here is a set of changes we made to improve U-Boot JFFS2 code
performance. We still can't reach Linux's performance but improvements
are significant.
Any comments are welcome.
Regards, Ilya.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.
13 matches
Mail list logo
