Scott,
> Looks mostly OK to me -- I was going to consider it for next, rather than
> master, as despite "fix" in the name it's really adding new hardware support.
Ahh, yeah, that makes sense. I will change "Fixes" to "Adds" for next
submission.
> You may want to use an #ifdef for bus width in
On Thu, 26 May 2011 09:40:46 -0400
Alex Waterman wrote:
>
> I know there has been a lot of activity related to other things in the U-Boot
> source, but has anyone had a chance to review this patch?
Looks mostly OK to me -- I was going to consider it for next, rather than
master, as despite "f
I know there has been a lot of activity related to other things in the U-Boot
source, but has anyone had a chance to review this patch?
Regards,
Alex
--
Alex Waterman
Computer Engineer
Phone: 215-896-4920
Email: awater...@dawning.com
___
U-Boot mail
From: Alex Waterman
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:08:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [NAND] Fixes 16bit NAND support with the NDFC
This patch adds support for 16 bit NAND devices attached to the
NDFC on ppc4xx processors. Two config entries were added:
CONFIG_SYS_NDFC_16- Setting this tells the
Dear Alex Waterman,
In message <4dd56fcf.2010...@dawning.com> you wrote:
> From ad2238044b9abc5a2094096219a1256a8ad091b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Waterman
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:08:36 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] [NAND] Fixes 16bit NAND support with the NDFC
>
> This patch adds sup
>From ad2238044b9abc5a2094096219a1256a8ad091b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Waterman
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:08:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [NAND] Fixes 16bit NAND support with the NDFC
This patch adds support for 16 bit NAND devices attached to the
NDFC on ppc4xx processors. Two config en
6 matches
Mail list logo
