Hi Marek,
On 15/06/2013 23:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
Using 1024 bytes for console buffer is unnecessarily too much,
lower the amount for all MXS boards to 256.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
Cc: Lauri Hintsala lauri.hints...@bluegiga.com
Hello Stefano,
I'm CCing Wolfgang,
Hi Marek,
On 15/06/2013 23:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
Using 1024 bytes for console buffer is unnecessarily too much,
lower the amount for all MXS boards to 256.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
Hallo Marek,
On 17/06/2013 14:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
I am missing something: which is the real advantage to reduce the
console buffer ? I do not think that the saved memory is worth, and on
the other side more elaborated scripts (usings nested if-then-else) are
quite long nowadays.
True,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Hallo Marek,
On 17/06/2013 14:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
I am missing something: which is the real advantage to reduce the
console buffer ? I do not think that the saved memory is worth, and on
the other side more elaborated
Using 1024 bytes for console buffer is unnecessarily too much,
lower the amount for all MXS boards to 256.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
Cc: Lauri Hintsala lauri.hints...@bluegiga.com
Cc: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
Cc: Stefano
5 matches
Mail list logo