Hi Jeroen,
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:30:54 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
wrote:
> Hello Albert,
>
> On 05-07-14 15:21, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Jeroen,
> >
> > (sorry for the near-duplicate, and see question at end)
> >
> > On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:36:47 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello
Hello Albert,
On 05-07-14 15:21, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
(sorry for the near-duplicate, and see question at end)
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:36:47 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
wrote:
Hello Albert,
On za, 2014-07-05 at 11:13 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:10:3
Hi Jeroen,
(sorry for the near-duplicate, and see question at end)
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:36:47 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
wrote:
> Hello Albert,
>
> On za, 2014-07-05 at 11:13 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Jeroen,
> >
> > On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:10:39 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
> > wrote:
> >
>
Hello Albert,
On za, 2014-07-05 at 11:13 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:10:39 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
> wrote:
>
> > When compiling u-boot with W=1 the extern inline void for
> > read* is likely causing the most noise. gcc / clang will
> > warn there is never
Hi Jeroen,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:10:39 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
wrote:
> When compiling u-boot with W=1 the extern inline void for
> read* is likely causing the most noise. gcc / clang will
> warn there is never a actual declaration for these functions.
> Instead of declaring these extern make the
When compiling u-boot with W=1 the extern inline void for
read* is likely causing the most noise. gcc / clang will
warn there is never a actual declaration for these functions.
Instead of declaring these extern make them static inline so
it is actually declared.
cc: Albert ARIBAUD
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo