Hi Tom,
[...]
+#ifndef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT is not used in the other patches.
Why is this needed ?
board/samsung/samsung/smdk6400 has a lowlevel_init.o function.
It is confusing why this function is being if-def and not the real
lowlevel_init..
Will remove.
Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The current ARM1176 CPU specific code is too specific to the SMDK6400
architecture. The following changes were necessary prerequisites for the
addition of other SoCs based on ARM1176.
Existing board's (SMDK6400) configuration has been modified to keep behavior
Chemparathy, Cyril wrote:
Hi Tom,
This patch is premature.
I need to see this patch within the context of the new SOC.
For a new SOC, I would like it be added as a new sub dir off of cpu/arm1176.
At the same level as s3c64xx. So this dir would look like.
config.mk cpu.c Makefile
Tom,
I was not able to access this link
But, yes, please include this patch as part of the tnetv107x patchset.
Sure. I will include this with the larger TNETV107X patchset and submit.
Until then, a code preview can be found at
Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The current ARM1176 CPU specific code is too specific to the SMDK6400
architecture. The following changes were necessary prerequisites for the
addition of other SoCs based on ARM1176.
Existing board's (SMDK6400) configuration has been modified to keep behavior
Hi Tom,
This patch is premature.
I need to see this patch within the context of the new SOC.
For a new SOC, I would like it be added as a new sub dir off of cpu/arm1176.
At the same level as s3c64xx. So this dir would look like.
config.mk cpu.c Makefile new_soc_name s3c64xx start.S
The current ARM1176 CPU specific code is too specific to the SMDK6400
architecture. The following changes were necessary prerequisites for the
addition of other SoCs based on ARM1176.
Existing board's (SMDK6400) configuration has been modified to keep behavior
unchanged despite these changes.
7 matches
Mail list logo