Hi Martha,
--- On Mon, 9/21/09, Martha M Stan wrote:
> From: Martha M Stan
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add mpc5125ads board and processor to the mpc512x
> family
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: "Martha M Stan"
> Date: Monday, September 21, 2009, 5:27 PM
&g
Dear Martha M Stan,
do you plan to send an updated patch for this release?
In addition to Fabio's comments here a few more:
In message <12535648622828-git-send-email-mm...@silicontkx.com> you wrote:
>
...
> diff --git a/board/freescale/mpc5125ads/mpc5125ads.c
> b/board/freescale/mpc5125ads/mpc5
ginal Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Sent 10/3/2009 6:43:51 PM
To: Martha M Stan mm...@silicontkx.com
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add mpc5125ads board and processor to the mpc512x
family
Dear Martha M Stan,
do you plan to send an updated patch for this re
Dear Martha,
umm... your mail header still says "m marx".
In message <20091004102089.sm01...@[206.180.163.89]> you wrote:
>
> I am planning to resubmit this patch very soon - by Tuesday perhaps.
> Considering there is some differences in the memory layout esp for the
> iopin struct (going from 3
Dear Martha Stan,
In message <1254987657-10103-1-git-send-email-mm...@silicontkx.com> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Martha Stan
> ---
> MAINTAINERS |5 +
> MAKEALL |1 +
> Makefile|3 +
> board/
Hi Wolfgang,
I had to chuckle when I read your opening paragraph – let me say that I have
never thought of myself as a victim – even at the hands of these FSL silicon
guys!!! But I did get a pretty raw deal – yes.
Now I am going to respond a little before I go and resubmit.
Very Best Regards,
Dear Martha,
In message <200910131345510.sm02...@[206.180.163.89]> you wrote:
>
> >We should avoid adding stuff to asm-offsets.h; instead, we should
> >finally auto-generate this file from the respective C structs as it's
> >done in Linux. Do you dare to tackle this?
>
> I can't do this any tim
Regarding 512x psc register maps:
The register map for 5125 does not just change the size of the registers.
Some registers change locations. The issue is that the hardware guys
decided to "fix" the old broken register access. The 5200, 5121, 5123 had
some registers that were:
Function A when re
> > Yes but the default has constants like CONFIG_SYS_MICRON_INIT_DEV_OP
> > ... must I then declare this if I am using
> > CONFIG_SYS_ELPIDA_INIT_DEV_OP ?
> Well, the ideas was that this was the default setting that fits most
> boards, and if it doesn't fit it will be overwritten by another arra
Dear Martha,
can you _please_ fix your mailer and make sure to keep the In-reply-to:
and References: mail headers in place and working, so threading of
messages works? Thanks.
In message <200910200953803.sm05...@[206.180.163.89]> you wrote:
>
> > Well, the ideas was that this was the default se
Dear John,
In message <4b73d43f0910191545x3127cba5w7fdec3f638213...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> The register map for 5125 does not just change the size of the registers.
> Some registers change locations. The issue is that the hardware guys
> decided to "fix" the old broken register access.
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 16:45 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Regarding 512x psc register maps:
>
> The register map for 5125 does not just change the size of the registers.
> Some registers change locations. The issue is that the hardware guys
> decided to "fix" the old broken register access. The 520
12 matches
Mail list logo
