Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca writes:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Nishanth Menon wrote:
I agree - I do not think there are any such plans. NAK to the patch.
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
fair enough. but i think a two-line comment is still useful for
people new to ARM who know the beagle
Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the
(OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
---
i'll let dirk be the judge as to whether this is worth adding, or if
he'd prefer a different phrasing.
diff --git
Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca writes:
Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the
(OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
---
i'll let dirk be the judge as to whether this is worth adding, or
2009/11/19 Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com:
Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca writes:
Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the
(OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
---
i'll let dirk be the
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca writes:
Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the
(OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
---
i'll let dirk
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Nishanth Menon wrote:
I agree - I do not think there are any such plans. NAK to the patch.
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
fair enough. but i think a two-line comment is still useful for
people new to ARM who know the beagle is a 3530 and wonder why all the
macros use 34XX.
6 matches
Mail list logo