Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen 2 others functions which are commom.
Could we use the patch that reply to this message instead?
The only downside that I can think of is that configuration that truly
don't require strmhz() and don't use --gc-sections will
ARM, i386, m68k and ppc all have identical implementations of strmhz().
Other architectures don't provide this function at all.
This patch moves strmhz() into lib_generic, reducing code duplication
and providing a more unified API across architectures.
Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL
2 matches
Mail list logo
