On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Vadim,
>
> Oops, dropped the ML...
>
> On Dec 10, 2011 9:20 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote:
>>
>> Hi Vadim,
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2011 12:14 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Vadim,
>> >
>> > On Dec 10, 2011 12:08 PM, "Vadim Bendebury"
>> > wrote
Hi Vadim,
Oops, dropped the ML...
On Dec 10, 2011 9:20 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote:
>
> Hi Vadim,
>
> On Dec 10, 2011 12:14 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vadim,
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2011 12:08 PM, "Vadim Bendebury"
wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Graeme Russ
wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
>
> Hi Vadim,
>
> On Dec 10, 2011 10:31 AM, "Vadim Bendebury" wrote:
> >
> > There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation
> > warnings when building the eNET target.
> >
> > While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init()
Hi Vadim,
On Dec 10, 2011 10:31 AM, "Vadim Bendebury" wrote:
>
> There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation
> warnings when building the eNET target.
>
> While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init() case seems a leftover
> from a quick edit, the arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc5
There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation
warnings when building the eNET target.
While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init() case seems a leftover
from a quick edit, the arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c:sc520_udelay()
seems to actually require accessing the register
There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation
warnings when building the eNET target.
While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init() case seems a leftover
from a quick edit, the arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c:sc520_udelay()
seems to actually require accessing the register
6 matches
Mail list logo