Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix compilation warnings when building eNET

2011-12-12 Thread Vadim Bendebury
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Vadim, > > Oops, dropped the ML... > > On Dec 10, 2011 9:20 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote: >> >> Hi Vadim, >> >> On Dec 10, 2011 12:14 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote: >> > >> > Hi Vadim, >> > >> > On Dec 10, 2011 12:08 PM, "Vadim Bendebury" >> > wrote

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix compilation warnings when building eNET

2011-12-10 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Vadim, Oops, dropped the ML... On Dec 10, 2011 9:20 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote: > > Hi Vadim, > > On Dec 10, 2011 12:14 PM, "Graeme Russ" wrote: > > > > Hi Vadim, > > > > On Dec 10, 2011 12:08 PM, "Vadim Bendebury" wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix compilation warnings when building eNET

2011-12-09 Thread Vadim Bendebury
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > > Hi Vadim, > > On Dec 10, 2011 10:31 AM, "Vadim Bendebury" wrote: > > > > There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation > > warnings when building the eNET target. > > > > While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init()

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix compilation warnings when building eNET

2011-12-09 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Vadim, On Dec 10, 2011 10:31 AM, "Vadim Bendebury" wrote: > > There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation > warnings when building the eNET target. > > While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init() case seems a leftover > from a quick edit, the arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc5

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix compilation warnings when building eNET

2011-12-09 Thread Vadim Bendebury
There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation warnings when building the eNET target. While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init() case seems a leftover from a quick edit, the arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c:sc520_udelay() seems to actually require accessing the register

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix compilation warnings when building eNET

2011-12-09 Thread Vadim Bendebury
There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation warnings when building the eNET target. While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init() case seems a leftover from a quick edit, the arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c:sc520_udelay() seems to actually require accessing the register