On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Grant Likely,
>
> In message <20110126165340.14306.98359.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> you
> wrote:
>> LMB doesn't currently handle allocating regions based at physical
>> address 0. This patch reworks the lmb_alloc functions to retu
Dear Grant Likely,
In message <20110126165340.14306.98359.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> you wrote:
> LMB doesn't currently handle allocating regions based at physical
> address 0. This patch reworks the lmb_alloc functions to return
> all ones when allocation fails instead of zero so that caller
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> LMB doesn't currently handle allocating regions based at physical
> address 0. This patch reworks the lmb_alloc functions to return
> all ones when allocation fails instead of zero so that callers can
> differentiate between a region allocate
LMB doesn't currently handle allocating regions based at physical
address 0. This patch reworks the lmb_alloc functions to return
all ones when allocation fails instead of zero so that callers can
differentiate between a region allocated at zero and a failed
allocation
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
4 matches
Mail list logo