Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
static unsigned long spi_bases[] = {
0x43fa4000,
0x5001,
0x53f84000,
};
Here hardcode the value in mx31, while in mx51 it use the macro. Which makes
Code style not consistent.
yes, agree, the driver already contains a lot of
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
[mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Stefano Babic
Sent: 2010年3月17日 0:22
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SPI: added support for MX51 to mxc_spi
This patch add support for MX51 processor
Tom wrote:
+#define MXC_CSPIRXDATA0x00
+#define MXC_CSPITXDATA0x04
+#define MXC_CSPICTRL0x08
+#define MXC_CSPIPERIOD_32KHZ(1 15)
+
Pulling these out and making them common may not be the best thing to do.
Located here, it hides the
#ifdef CONFIG_MX27
#elif
Stefano Babic wrote:
This patch add support for MX51 processor and
supports transfer of multiple word in a single
transation.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
The patch adds support for the MX51 and wants to remove some
limitation on the old driver. Actually, the buffer
This patch add support for MX51 processor and
supports transfer of multiple word in a single
transation.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
---
The patch adds support for the MX51 and wants to remove some
limitation on the old driver. Actually, the buffer passed
to the transfer function
5 matches
Mail list logo
