On Sunday, November 07, 2010 10:11:14 Sebastien Carlier wrote:
> On 11/07/2010 03:16 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> > I'm guessing lots of boards will have this same issue. I imagine its
> > due to include/config_cmd_defaults.h, so maybe if you fix the issue in
> > that one place all the compile issues
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message <1289168695.3511.11.ca...@ptyser-laptop> you wrote:
>
> > > new 100% $(AR)-free version is available here:
> >
> > Please post your patch on the mailing list for review.
>
> For what its worth, Sebastien's patch is significantly larger than the
> 100K mailing list li
Hi Wolfgang,
> In message <4cd56618.4010...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> >
> > My previous patch missed some places that create library archives. A
> > new 100% $(AR)-free version is available here:
>
> Please post your patch on the mailing list for review.
For what its worth, Sebastien's patch is
Dear Sebastien Carlier,
In message <4cd56618.4010...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> My previous patch missed some places that create library archives. A
> new 100% $(AR)-free version is available here:
Please post your patch on the mailing list for review.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Sof
Dear Sebastien Carlier,
Am 07.11.2010 um 17:18 schrieb Sebastien Carlier:
> Dear Andreas,
>
> On 11/07/2010 04:30 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
>> I guess the boards are broken before your library changes too.
>
> The boards in question do actually build with library archives. The
> final binary
Dear Andreas,
On 11/07/2010 04:30 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> I guess the boards are broken before your library changes too.
The boards in question do actually build with library archives. The
final binary does not make use of the NFS stuff, therefore the linker
does not need to resolve the un
Dear Sebastien Carlier,
Am 07.11.2010 um 16:11 schrieb Sebastien Carlier:
> Dear Peter,
>
> On 11/07/2010 03:16 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>> - You shouldn't be making changes to stuff like CONFIG_CMD_NFS in this
>> patch. Its unrelated, and should be dealt with in another patch. eg
>> your patche
Dear Peter,
On 11/07/2010 03:16 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> You shouldn't need to send the patch using "git send-email". The patch
> is greater than U-Boot's mailing list limit (100k) and posting the patch
> on a website is perfectly acceptable. Also, it shouldn't be necessary
> to split the patch
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 18:21 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 06/11/2010 15:28, Sebastien Carlier a écrit :
> > Hello all,
> >
> > My previous patch missed some places that create library archives. A
> > new 100% $(AR)-free version is available here:
> >
> > http://io.oiioiio.com/~sebc/0001-
Le 06/11/2010 15:28, Sebastien Carlier a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> My previous patch missed some places that create library archives. A
> new 100% $(AR)-free version is available here:
>
> http://io.oiioiio.com/~sebc/0001-Use-partial-linking-v2.patch
>
> I have tested this patch with MAKEALL
Hello all,
My previous patch missed some places that create library archives. A
new 100% $(AR)-free version is available here:
http://io.oiioiio.com/~sebc/0001-Use-partial-linking-v2.patch
I have tested this patch with MAKEALL -A arm and checked that it does
not break any build on this a
11 matches
Mail list logo