The TPM code was added more than a year or 4 releases ago. This was
done under the proposition that board support that would actually use
such code would be added soon. However, nothing happened since. The
code has no users in mainline, and does not even get build for any
configuration, so we ca
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> The TPM code was added more than a year or 4 releases ago. This was
> done under the proposition that board support that would actually use
> such code would be added soon. However, nothing happened since. The
> code has no us
Dear Simon,
In message
you wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > The TPM code was added more than a year or 4 releases ago. This was
> > done under the proposition that board support that would actually use
> > such code would be added soon. However, nothing hap
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > The TPM code was added more than a year or 4 releases ago. This was
>> > done under the proposition that board support
Dear Simon,
In message
you wrote:
>
> >> I think you may have missed the pending patches which make use of
> >> this. it is important functionality for the Chromebooks (secure boot).
> >
> > No, I have not missed these. But all the patch does is set
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_LPC_TPM - there is still
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> >> I think you may have missed the pending patches which make use of
>> >> this. it is important functionality for the Chromebooks (secure boot).
>> >
>> > No, I have not missed
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
> OK, but I still don't quite get it. As I asked in the other thread,
> are you not interested in TPM functionality at all until we have a
> verified boot implementation, or are you happy to have things progress
> in stages? I'm will to work through thi
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> OK, but I still don't quite get it. As I asked in the other thread,
>> are you not interested in TPM functionality at all until we have a
>> verified boot implementation, o
Dear Simon,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > This is not exactly a proposal that triggers enthusiasm to me.
>
> Enthusiasm is a strong word...
I tried to find a strictly non-negative phrasing here, because I felt
that would be somewhat better ;-)
> Let's take an example. We have AHCI/SATA support
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > This is not exactly a proposal that triggers enthusiasm to me.
>>
>> Enthusiasm is a strong word...
>
> I tried to find a strictly non-negative phrasing here, because I felt
>
Dear Tom,
In message <1351960246-31771-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> The TPM code was added more than a year or 4 releases ago. This was
> done under the proposition that board support that would actually use
> such code would be added soon. However, nothing happened since. The
> co
Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <1351960246-31771-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
>> The TPM code was added more than a year or 4 releases ago. This was
>> done under the proposition that board support that would actually use
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> In message <1351960246-31771-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
>>> The TPM code was added more than a year or 4 releases ago. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/22/12 14:42, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Simon Glass
> wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk
>> wrote:
>>> Dear Tom,
>>>
>>> In message <1351960246-31771-1-
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/22/12 14:42, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Simon Glass
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Wolfgang
15 matches
Mail list logo
