On May 24, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the
> first 16MB of RAM). If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will allocate an
> LMB region in the bootmap and copy the fdt into that region. It will also
> increase the s
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the
> first 16MB of RAM). If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will allocate an
> LMB region in the bootmap and copy the fdt into that region. It will also
> increase th
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> I would like to see any ACK or Tested-by: from actual users of this code.
>
> Kumar, who should ack this patch?
This patch has been tested and acked by Ira Synder:
http://lists.denx.de
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I would like to see any ACK or Tested-by: from actual users of this code.
Kumar, who should ack this patch?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.
Dear Kumar,
In message <20100802205706.56072d3c...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
>
> In message you
> wrote:
> >
> > As this isn't to 8xxx related code I'm NOT going to apply it. Wolfgang
> > should.
>
> Which boards except 8xxx actually use that code? I mean, which boards
> can be used for testi
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message you wrote:
>
> As this isn't to 8xxx related code I'm NOT going to apply it. Wolfgang
> should.
Which boards except 8xxx actually use that code? I mean, which boards
can be used for testing?
[I don't remember any Tested-by: messages ?]
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar, do you have any issues with this patch? I submitted it in May,
> but you never picked it up.
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the
>> first 16M
Kumar, do you have any issues with this patch? I submitted it in May,
but you never picked it up.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the
> first 16MB of RAM). If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will al
On Jul 17, 2010, at 10:17 PM, "Jerry Van Baren" wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
> ^
> Need a space in your SOB line?
That's your mailer, not me. Check the archive -- my message is correct.
> I assume this is a "live" patch, and replaces the patch with the subject
Hi Timur,
On 05/24/2010 04:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the
> first 16MB of RAM). If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will allocate an
> LMB region in the bootmap and copy the fdt into that region. It will also
> increase t
The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the
first 16MB of RAM). If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will allocate an
LMB region in the bootmap and copy the fdt into that region. It will also
increase the size of the fdt.
If the fdt is already in the bootmap, th
11 matches
Mail list logo
