Dear Reinhard,
Am 13.10.2011 12:27, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>>> if (set_interrupt_handler(0, &timer_interrupt_handler, 3))
>>> - return;
>>> + return 0;
>>
>> NAK, this is an error and should return a negative value (though the
>> return value is cu
On Thursday 13 October 2011 06:27:38 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
> > BTW there is another patch pending ->
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/
>
> I'll apply that one in the year 2015 ;)
>
> NO.. its on my list for applying into next
WFM
-mike
signature.asc
Descrip
Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>> if (set_interrupt_handler(0, &timer_interrupt_handler, 3))
>> -return;
>> +return 0;
>
> NAK, this is an error and should return a negative value (though the
> return value is currently not evaluated).
Agreed
>
> BTW there is another patch
Dear Mike,
Am 13.10.2011 07:11, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> The common.h header says this has to return an int, otherwise we get
> build failures due to mismatched prototype and function definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
> ---
> arch/avr32/cpu/interrupts.c |6 --
> 1 files cha
The common.h header says this has to return an int, otherwise we get
build failures due to mismatched prototype and function definition.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
arch/avr32/cpu/interrupts.c |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/avr32/cpu/inte
5 matches
Mail list logo