On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:59:35AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:07:00PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes the Integrator has PCI support since ages, and I do have a VGA
> >> card mounted in one of the slots .
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:07:00PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> Yes the Integrator has PCI support since ages, and I do have a VGA
>> card mounted in one of the slots ... the only issue is that I need
>> biosemu to be working to initialize it
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:07:00PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Grr, I missed this discussion, sorry. But I don't feel this falls into
> > the "no dead code" rule, but does fall into the "lets not make life too
> > hard for others" rule I h
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Grr, I missed this discussion, sorry. But I don't feel this falls into
> the "no dead code" rule, but does fall into the "lets not make life too
> hard for others" rule I have at least. There's at least one board in
> u-boot-arm now (ti814x) whi
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:32:40PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:09:21 +0200, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
> > wrote:
> >
> > > NAK -- no ARM target needs bios emulation, so basing the #define on ARM
> > > re
Hi Linus,
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:09:21 +0200, Linus Walleij
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
>
> > NAK -- no ARM target needs bios emulation, so basing the #define on ARM
> > requirements is incorrect.
> >
> > Actually, ARM targets build drivers/bios_emulator/li
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> NAK -- no ARM target needs bios emulation, so basing the #define on ARM
> requirements is incorrect.
>
> Actually, ARM targets build drivers/bios_emulator/libatibiosemu.o as
> the result of an overlook in ./Makefile where this object is com
Hi Linus,
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:14:14 +0200, Linus Walleij
wrote:
> This makes sure we have inline functions such as inb/outb that
> are used in these two files by including the arch-specific
> header. However the ARM version does not provide the
> accessors unless the config symbol __io is al
This makes sure we have inline functions such as inb/outb that
are used in these two files by including the arch-specific
header. However the ARM version does not provide the
accessors unless the config symbol __io is also defined so add
that in front of the include.
After this the bios emulator
9 matches
Mail list logo
