[U-Boot] [PATCH] common/board_f: make board_init_f_mem() independent on !CONFIG_X86

2015-03-16 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Even though board_init_f_mem() is not used on x86 today there's no reason to not use it in the future. Moreover board_init_f_mem() has nothing to do with any particular architecture so move it away from #else /* CONFIG_X86 */ Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin Cc: Simon Glass Cc: Tom Rini --- comm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common/board_f: make board_init_f_mem() independent on !CONFIG_X86

2015-03-23 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Hi Tom, Simon, On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 11:03 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Even though board_init_f_mem() is not used on x86 today there's no > reason to not use it in the future. > > Moreover board_init_f_mem() has nothing to do with any particular > architecture so move it away from #else /* CON

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common/board_f: make board_init_f_mem() independent on !CONFIG_X86

2015-03-23 Thread Simon Glass
On 23 March 2015 at 10:40, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Tom, Simon, > > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 11:03 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> Even though board_init_f_mem() is not used on x86 today there's no >> reason to not use it in the future. >> >> Moreover board_init_f_mem() has nothing to do with any p

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common/board_f: make board_init_f_mem() independent on !CONFIG_X86

2015-03-23 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Hi Simon, On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:26 -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > On 23 March 2015 at 10:40, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > Hi Tom, Simon, > > > > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 11:03 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > >> Even though board_init_f_mem() is not used on x86 today there's no > >> reason to not use it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common/board_f: make board_init_f_mem() independent on !CONFIG_X86

2015-03-23 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Alexey, On 23 March 2015 at 15:17, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:26 -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> On 23 March 2015 at 10:40, Alexey Brodkin >> wrote: >> > Hi Tom, Simon, >> > >> > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 11:03 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> >> Even though board