Albert,
On Friday 29 March 2013 08:00:54 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 23:35 +0100, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > On Thursday 28 March 2013 21:42:13 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > Which fields, which structures, which files are affected by the
> > > unalignment issue?
> >
> > i
Hi Marc,
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 23:35 +0100, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Thursday 28 March 2013 21:42:13 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:57:31 +0100, Marc Dietrich
> > wrote:
> > > Many on-disk structures used in the directory are accessed in a
> > > non aligned mann
Hi Albert,
On Thursday 28 March 2013 21:42:13 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:57:31 +0100, Marc Dietrich
> wrote:
> > Many on-disk structures used in the directory are accessed in a
> > non aligned manner. gcc => 4.7 (and gcc-4.6 from Linaro) switched
> > to -munaligned-access on d
Hi Marc,
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:57:31 +0100, Marc Dietrich
wrote:
> Many on-disk structures used in the directory are accessed in a
> non aligned manner. gcc => 4.7 (and gcc-4.6 from Linaro) switched
> to -munaligned-access on default causing exceptions on ARM. The
> easiest way to fix this is t
Many on-disk structures used in the directory are accessed in a
non aligned manner. gcc => 4.7 (and gcc-4.6 from Linaro) switched
to -munaligned-access on default causing exceptions on ARM. The
easiest way to fix this is to force no-unaligned-access in this
(non speed critical) directory.
Signed-o
5 matches
Mail list logo