Dear Aaron Pace,
In message <4c4de8dc.4020...@alcatel-lucent.com> you wrote:
> Fix optimization bug for doubly-indirect block pointers
>
> Doubly-indirect block numbers are compared against the first-level
> indirect block when checking for a cached copy. This is causing the
> doubly-indirect bl
Dear Aaron Pace,
In message <4c4def0c.3020...@alcatel-lucent.com> you wrote:
> Apologies for the oversight, here's the non line-wrapped version.
It is still white space corrupted - where the original code has TABs,
your file has all SPACEs only.
Please never try to cvopy & paste patches, this do
Apologies for the oversight, here's the non line-wrapped version.
Fix optimization bug for doubly-indirect block pointers
Doubly-indirect block numbers are compared against the first-level
indirect block when checking for a cached copy. This is causing the
doubly-indirect block to be re-read eac
Fix optimization bug for doubly-indirect block pointers
Doubly-indirect block numbers are compared against the first-level
indirect block when checking for a cached copy. This is causing the
doubly-indirect block to be re-read each time it is accessed.
Repairing this reduces load time for a 70M f
4 matches
Mail list logo
