Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: Move fdt_fixup_ethernet to a common place

2017-04-29 Thread Simon Glass
On 28 April 2017 at 06:51, Tom Rini wrote: > With 3f66149d9fb4 we no longer have a common call fdt_fixup_ethernet. > This was fine to do on PowerPC as they largely had calls already in > ft_cpu_fixup. On ARM however we largely relied on this call. Rather > than introduce a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: Move fdt_fixup_ethernet to a common place

2017-04-28 Thread York Sun
On 04/28/2017 05:50 AM, Tom Rini wrote: With 3f66149d9fb4 we no longer have a common call fdt_fixup_ethernet. This was fine to do on PowerPC as they largely had calls already in ft_cpu_fixup. On ARM however we largely relied on this call. Rather than introduce a large number of changes to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: Move fdt_fixup_ethernet to a common place

2017-04-28 Thread Stefan Roese
On 28.04.2017 14:51, Tom Rini wrote: With 3f66149d9fb4 we no longer have a common call fdt_fixup_ethernet. This was fine to do on PowerPC as they largely had calls already in ft_cpu_fixup. On ARM however we largely relied on this call. Rather than introduce a large number of changes to

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: Move fdt_fixup_ethernet to a common place

2017-04-28 Thread Tom Rini
With 3f66149d9fb4 we no longer have a common call fdt_fixup_ethernet. This was fine to do on PowerPC as they largely had calls already in ft_cpu_fixup. On ARM however we largely relied on this call. Rather than introduce a large number of changes to ft_cpu_fixup / ft_board_fixup we recognize