Hi,
On 03/18/2014 10:14 PM, Eli Billauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're completely out of sync with our git repositories,
but I changed the relevant parts in my zynqpl.c (with the patch of this
thread not applied), and it worked well. The alignment went downwards as
expected.
That's interesting. An
Hello,
We're completely out of sync with our git repositories, but I changed
the relevant parts in my zynqpl.c (with the patch of this thread not
applied), and it worked well. The alignment went downwards as expected.
Regards,
Eli
On 18/03/14 14:17, Michal Simek wrote:
Does this work for
On 03/18/2014 11:20 AM, Eli Billauer wrote:
> On 18/03/14 08:11, S Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote:
>> This looks like not correct because if you look at the code above this, it
>> always ensuring that the new aligned buffer start is in front of the actual
>> buffer
>
> Maybe it should, but it doesn
On 18/03/14 08:11, S Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote:
This looks like not correct because if you look at the code above
this, it always ensuring that the new aligned buffer start is in front
of the actual buffer
Maybe it should, but it doesn't. In the boot log it says:
zynq_load: Align buffer at
Hi Eli,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Eli Billauer wrote:
> The aligned buffer is always with a higher address, so copying should run
> from the end of the buffer to the beginning, and not the other way around.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eli Billauer
> ---
> drivers/fpga/zynqpl.c |5 +++--
> 1
The aligned buffer is always with a higher address, so copying should run
from the end of the buffer to the beginning, and not the other way around.
Signed-off-by: Eli Billauer
---
drivers/fpga/zynqpl.c |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/zyn
6 matches
Mail list logo
