The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
directory entries which aren't placed in a single sector.
This was becouse of the buffer was always filled by the
two sectors, and the loop was made also for two sectors.
If some file long name entries are stored in two sectors,
the we have t
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
>
> The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
> directory entries which aren't placed in a single sector.
>
> This was becouse of the buffer was always filled by the
> two sectors, and the loop was made also for t
Hello,
On 12/12/2014 01:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
directory entries which aren't placed in a single sector.
This was becouse of the buffer was always filled by the
t
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 12 December 2014 at 08:30, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 12/12/2014 01:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Przemyslaw,
>>
>> On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
>>> directory
Hello,
On 12/16/2014 11:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 12 December 2014 at 08:30, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello,
On 12/12/2014 01:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
The present fat implementation ignores FAT
Hello,
On 12/16/2014 11:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 12 December 2014 at 08:30, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello,
On 12/12/2014 01:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
The present fat implementation ignores FAT
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 17 December 2014 at 02:03, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 12/16/2014 11:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Przemyslaw,
>>
>> On 12 December 2014 at 08:30, Przemyslaw Marczak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2014 01:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
Hello Simon,
On 12/18/2014 04:39 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 17 December 2014 at 02:03, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello,
On 12/16/2014 11:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 12 December 2014 at 08:30, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
Hello,
On 12/12/2014 01:32 AM, Simo
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 03:26, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
>
> On 12/18/2014 04:39 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Przemyslaw,
>>
>> On 17 December 2014 at 02:03, Przemyslaw Marczak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/16/2014 11:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 02:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 03:26, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 12/18/2014 04:39 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 17 December 2014 at 02:03, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
Hello,
On 12/16/2014 11:26 PM, Simo
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 06:31, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 12/18/2014 02:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Przemyslaw,
>>
>> On 18 December 2014 at 03:26, Przemyslaw Marczak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Simon,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2014 04:39 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 02:36 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 06:31, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 02:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 03:26, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 12/18/2014 04:39 AM, Simo
Hi,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
> directory entries which aren't placed in a single sector.
>
> This was becouse of the buffer was always filled by the
> two sectors, and the loop was made also for two sectors.
>
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 02:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
directory entries which aren't placed in a single sector.
This was becouse of the buffer was always filled by the
two sectors,
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 02:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
directory entries which aren't placed in a single sector.
This was becouse of the buffer was always filled by the
two sectors,
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 07:32, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/18/2014 02:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
>>> directory entries which are
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 03:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 07:32, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 02:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 11 December 2014 at 05:01, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
The present fat implementation ignores FAT16 long name
Hi,
On 18 December 2014 at 07:40, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 12/18/2014 03:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Przemyslaw,
>>
>> On 18 December 2014 at 07:32, Przemyslaw Marczak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2014 02:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
>>
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 03:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 18 December 2014 at 07:40, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 03:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 18 December 2014 at 07:32, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
Hello,
On 12/18/2014 02:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
19 matches
Mail list logo