On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 09:09 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> Please note that I'm taking http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/297361/ as
> the solution for this problem, thanks!
>
As long as it resolves overflow issue (and from that patch I'd say it
should) I'm totally fine with it.
Thanks.
P.S. funny eno
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:07:51AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:01:07AM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 16:57 +0400, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > Current implementation works fine if "usec * get_tbclk()" fits in 32
> > > bits. Otherwi
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:01:07AM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 16:57 +0400, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Current implementation works fine if "usec * get_tbclk()" fits in 32
> > bits. Otherwise result will be cut down to 32-bit.
> >
> > Fix is obvious - first ex
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 16:57 +0400, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Current implementation works fine if "usec * get_tbclk()" fits in 32
> bits. Otherwise result will be cut down to 32-bit.
>
> Fix is obvious - first extend data type of either operand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin
>
> Cc:
Current implementation works fine if "usec * get_tbclk()" fits in 32
bits. Otherwise result will be cut down to 32-bit.
Fix is obvious - first extend data type of either operand.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Mischa Jonker
---
lib/time.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertio
5 matches
Mail list logo
