Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2009-01-22 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:00:56 -0800 (PST) Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Since my new board patch is dependent on this being applied is it possible to now resubmit my new board patch? I thought you'd never ask :) please base it on u-boot-mpc83xx next. Kim

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2009-01-22 Thread Ron Madrid
Should this go to the main u-boot mail list or should I send it somewhere else? Ron --- On Thu, 1/22/09, Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote: From: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S To: ron_mad

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2009-01-21 Thread Kim Phillips
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:12:45 -0800 Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Currently there are in excess of 100 bytes located at the beginning of the image built by start.S that are not being utilized. This patch moves a few functions into this part of the image. This will create a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2009-01-12 Thread Ron Madrid
: [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net Date: Friday, December 12, 2008, 1:12 PM Currently there are in excess of 100 bytes located at the beginning of the image built by start.S that are not being utilized. This patch moves

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2008-12-15 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:26:03AM +0100, Jens Gehrlein wrote: Hi Ron, Ron Madrid schrieb: Currently there are in excess of 100 bytes located at the beginning of the image built by start.S that are not being utilized. Hmmm, are you sure? What if someone designs a board, where the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2008-12-15 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Hi Scott, Scott Wood schrieb: On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:26:03AM +0100, Jens Gehrlein wrote: Hi Ron, Ron Madrid schrieb: Currently there are in excess of 100 bytes located at the beginning of the image built by start.S that are not being utilized. Hmmm, are you sure? What if someone

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2008-12-14 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Hi Ron, Ron Madrid schrieb: Currently there are in excess of 100 bytes located at the beginning of the image built by start.S that are not being utilized. Hmmm, are you sure? What if someone designs a board, where the processor shall load its reset configuration from a local bus EEPROM, e.g.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Size optimization of start.S

2008-12-12 Thread Ron Madrid
Currently there are in excess of 100 bytes located at the beginning of the image built by start.S that are not being utilized. This patch moves a few functions into this part of the image. This will create a greater number of *available* bytes that can be used by board specific code in NAND